Longtime GOP Sen. Arlen Specter becomes Democrat WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Veteran Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter told colleagues Tuesday that he switched from the Republican to the Democratic Party, Sen. Harry Reid says. Sen. Arlen Specter was expected to face a tough primary challenge in 2010. The Specter party switch would give Democrats a filibuster-proof Senate majority of 60 seats if Al Franken holds his current lead in the disputed Minnesota Senate race. "Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right," Specter said in a statement posted by his office on PoliticsPA.com. "Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans." Specter, a five-term Senate veteran, was greeted by a loud, sustained round of applause by dozens of constituents outside his Washington office shortly after the news broke. "I don't have to say anything to them," a smiling Specter said. "They've said it to me." Watch constituents cheer for Specter » President Obama called Specter shortly after learning the news during his daily economic briefing in the Oval Office on Tuesday morning, according to a senior administration official. "You have my full support, and we're thrilled to have you," Obama told Specter. Jubilant Senate Democrats also welcomed the news. "Sen. Specter and I have had a long dialogue about his place in an evolving Republican party," Senate Majority Leader Reid, D-Nevada, said in a written statement. "We have not always agreed on every issue, but [he] has shown a willingness to work in a bipartisan manner, put people over party and do what is right for Pennsylvanians and all Americans." Reid called Specter a "man of honor and integrity" who would be welcome in the Democratic caucus. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele ripped Specter, calling him a Republican in name only who was out of step with the rest of the party because of his "left-wing voting record." "Some in the Republican Party are happy about this. I am not," Steele said in a written statement. "Let's be honest --Sen. Specter didn't leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary due to his left-wing voting record." Steele said Republicans "look forward to beating Sen. Specter in 2010, assuming the Democrats don't do it first." Specter was expected to face a very tough primary challenge in 2010 from former Rep. Pat Toomey, who nearly defeated Specter in the Pennsylvania GOP Senate primary in 2004. Watch why Specter decided to switch » A Quinnipiac University survey of registered Pennsylvania voters released last month showed Specter trailing the more conservative Toomey in a hypothetical primary matchup, 41 to 27 percent. A separate Franklin & Marshall survey showed Specter leading Toomey 33 to 18 percent. Another 42 percent, however, were undecided. More than half of the Republicans polled in the Franklin & Marshall survey said they would prefer to see someone new in the Senate. Numerous Republicans are angry with Specter over his recent vote in support of President Obama's $787 billion stimulus plan. Specter, one of only three GOP senators to vote for the measure, has been part of a dwindling group of GOP moderates from the northeastern part of the country. The 79-year-old former Philadelphia district attorney won his first of five Senate terms in 1980. He has been a leading Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee for much of the past two decades, serving as its chairman from 2005 to 2007. Specter served on the Warren Commission, which investigated the 1963 assassination of President Kennedy. He has survived bouts with cancer three times, most recently undergoing chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease in 2005.
Not surprising. All of the early polling indicated that he would have lost in the Republican primary next year. He's just desperate to keep his seat.
He's been an ultra-liberal for years. It's about time he moved to the other side of the aisle. Good riddance.
I actually broke out laughing when I first read this article earlier.:mrgreen: What was even funnier was RNC Chairman Michael Steele's response to all of this. I was wondering when Steele would re-surface in the news after Rush Limbaugh publicly pulled his hoe-card.:smt043
This is quite momentous for Obama as it appears that Al Franken will hold on to take the Senate seat in Minnesota, which gives the Democrats a filibuster proof majority in Congress. This gives Obama a level of power rarely seen at the presidential level. If he remains wise, he'll secure a wide base of congressional support through the entire tenure of his presidency. Kathleen Sibelius was also approved as the Secretary of Health and Human Services today. This sets the stage for Obama to push through healthcare and other reforms with little no resistance from Republicans in the House and Senate. Truly a major coup for him and the Democratic party.
Even though I like Specter as a person, even Stevie Wonder can see through the blatant self-interest involved in this move. Specter was lagging behind Pat Toomey in the polls, and the Pennsylvania GOP Primary is open only to Republicans. Of course, Democrats and independents have been voting for Specter for years now but that was in the general election. With Specter looking like he was toast, he probably figured that the only way to save his political skin was to jump aboard the Democratic freight train. Dems in PA have liked Specter for years and have voted for him as a Republican, so why wont they do it now he's a Democrat? It doesn't take a genius to figure that out. Of course, he's entitled to do it and i support his decision by the way. If he stayed in the Republican Party, they would have pulled a Lincoln Chafee on his ass i.e. back his primary opponent and leave him dead in the waters in the general (if he makes it out of course). Of course, to say the Republicans won't be pleased by all of this is probably the biggest understatement in this still very young century. The reaction from the GOP establishment was comical. The House and Senate Republicans (rightly) noted the astute nature of the political advantageousness, but rather than bitching about it, they should go back, have a serious soul-searching and come to a decision about whether they want to be a "big tent" party or the party of Southern white males, war-mongering neocons and pseudo-theologians only. Who knows, Snowe and Collins could be next.
They were already doing that. Toomey is getting a lot of support from Grover Norquist and The Club for Growth. If those idiots have their way, they'll run all of the moderate Republicans out of Congress. At this rate, the GOP is going to end up being nothing more than a regional party within the next couple of election cycles. They probably will be. Besides those two and Peter King, are any other Republicans left in Congress from the Northeast? :smt017
It's good that the dems have control of the House, Senate and WH. Now they have an opportunity to show what it is that they as a party can do for America with little effective opposition. After four years or so, the voters will be able to evaluate how they did. Ain't America great?
Certainly it was a calculated move on Specter's part but he sees the writing on the wall. He is a dying breed: moderate on many issues and slightly right of center as a Republican. The Republicans used to be on the pulse of the nation but as they have become more extremist, the nation has moved to the other side. There are extreme liberals but if the nation is left of center, then it is much easier for a liberal to make the connection to a potential segment of the electorate. The problem for the GOP is that instead of taking their medicine and formulating a new strategy, they are stuck using Gingrich's "Contract with America" and classic 80's Regan to revitalize an America that has moved past that line of thinking. Each step they take is akin to driving a car in quicksand...you only sink deeper. There is more pressure on Obama simply because he can not blame congressional Republicans for denying him the opportunity to pass legislation. The spotlight is on him...however, if he has a reasonable amount of success in passing effective legislation...the Democrats could see a sustained growth of power for an entire generation.
This is why I'm so glad that more and more brothas are following politics like myself. Very well stated Cris, very well.:smt023
Voters from that area voted for a Republican and those folks probally feel cheated by Spector. Pat Toomey will win by a landslide. He also voted for this spending bill so many were fed up with him.
Proving once again that you know absolutely nothing about politics beyond Republican talking points. Toomey is leading by a large margin in the early primary polling, but that is because Pennsylvania has closed primaries. Therefore, he is only has a large lead among Republicans. The state has been trending heavily Democratic for the last two years. IIRC over 200,000 registered Republicans in Penn have switched party affiliation since 2007, and Rick Santorum, who was considered to be a presidential hopeful a few years back, lost by 18 points to Casey in 2006. There is no way in hell that Toomey is going to win the general election whether he faces Specter or another Democrat.
I know nothing about politics. (thats why Republicans have recruited me for positions) Buddy, in those past two years it was a anti- Bush vote. They were voting against Bush instead of voting for the Democrat. When Obama ran and my state governor ran they ran against Bush. Obama will not be able to Blame George Bush for his mistakes it will be on his shoulders.