Prediction: Health Care Bill Will Not Pass

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Blacktiger2005, Mar 17, 2010.

  1. lippy

    lippy Well-Known Member

    thanks chi...i know it's not a popular stance...funny thing is that i don't see it as being liberal as someone else mentioned...i see it as a necessity for the future of this country
     
  2. Espy

    Espy New Member

    Hahahaha! Sweetie you're not operating under the mistaken impression that people who want to tell other people how to live their lives subscribe to logic are you? That's why they make what they say as sensational or shocking as possible, it deflects attention from the fact that logic has nothing to do with it. Think David Copperfield, classic misdirection.
     
  3. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    Very good point. But I wonder how they have a voice with no logic to back up their statements
     
  4. Sir Nose

    Sir Nose New Member

    If a man who fathered the child has no say in whether or not his own baby lives or dies, then how can he be held responsible for support if the child is born?

    If he has no say in the matter, then the child is her sole responsibility.
     
  5. lippy

    lippy Well-Known Member

    welcome back stranger:) no, i am not going to debate abortion with you...we stand on opposite ends of the spectrum on that issue...a blood bath lippy will avoid
     
  6. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    Gotta cosign this. It's logical.
     
  7. Sir Nose

    Sir Nose New Member

    :smt006
     
  8. tuckerreed

    tuckerreed New Member


    sadly i think they will pull it off, buy someone off like they did with ben nelson, but they will get the 216, even though reconciliation with the slaughter attack will be unconstitutional not to allow the congress to vote
     
  9. Espy

    Espy New Member

    I have no problem with that. If a man doesn't feel it appropriate to support his child, I personally wouldn't want his support.

    However, Tucker wasn't speaking as if he was the father, he was speaking as a third party. Therefore I stand by my earlier statement that a woman's choices are none of his business.
     
  10. chicity

    chicity New Member

    ...unlike all the times when Republicans did it, when it was perfectly constitutional.
     
  11. chicity

    chicity New Member

    I wouldn't say that the father should have no say. If I was personally speaking to a Woman individually, and she wanted my advice, I'd advise her to talk to the father.

    But legally she must have final say, because only she has to carry that child. The father cannot offer to do it for her.

    Once the baby is alive, it is up to both parents to see to it that it survives. Women are not allowed to ignore their child support when Fathers have custody, either. It's not fair that sometimes Men have to pay when they did not want a child. Forcing Women to bear children they do not want, or forcing children to grow up in poverty because one or both parents don't want to pay child support isn't fair either.

    There is no way to make this fair, until science allows fetuses can survive outside the womb for the full 9 months.
     
  12. raocha

    raocha Active Member


    Awesome, WWMB.com's favorite Conservative douchebag is back. It's amazing to see people like you who are so casually dismissive regarding true stories about Americans who have suffered greatly under the current system because of the health insurance corporations that derive profits from denying medical coverage to people.

    BTW what exactly do you people mean when you characterize this bill as being "rammed" through Congress? I find shocking that so many of you Conservative uberpatriots are so utterly disdainful of the legislative process and system of laws in this Country whenever you don't get your way.
     
  13. raocha

    raocha Active Member


    So I take it that you think everyone who qualified for Bush's "unconstitutional" tax cuts should give them back because of the manner in which they were passed or rather, "rammed," though Congress?


    Seriously, do you fucking idiots have any compunction whatsoever about regurgitating this dishonest, hypocritical nonsense in serious political discussions?
     
  14. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to raocha again.
     
  15. z

    z Well-Known Member

    Saying tomorrow will be a historic moment, is definately understatement. It will be interesting to watch. If this bill pass when is going to be effective, 2014? Also can this bill be repealed if Obama does not seek reelection and if someone else takes over the white house in 2012?
     
  16. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    If this bill passes and the economy improves, BHO will def. seek re-election.
     
  17. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    This economy is so fucked because the same assholes who fucked shit up still have their jobs and are doing the same thing with tax payer money. You watch Real Time right?
     
  18. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    LOL another one who glosses over all the previous points to jump on Karma. And I don't have cable because of the shitty economy :smt043
     
  19. z

    z Well-Known Member

    This bill is going to change America very dramatically for better or for worse time will tell. Is this the biggest change in 1/2 century of American history or what? For sure change has arrived in DC. I wonder what the trial lawyers are thinking right about now... hmmmm
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2010
  20. Sneakeedyck

    Sneakeedyck New Member

    Bill Maher is a idiot. He wants people to not eat beef for climate change. Anybody that a Christian is stupid. Christians give millions to the poor how worse would the world be without them?
     

Share This Page