Barack Obama vs Mitt Romney round 1

Discussion in 'Politics' started by archangel, Oct 4, 2012.

  1. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    I agree look at Bill Gates Warren Buffet Russel Simons and a slew of other rich people they are very philinthropic
     
  2. JordanC

    JordanC Well-Known Member

    Mitt Romney $77,000 tax deduction for his wife's horse hobby. :smt069

    Someone needs to demonize those who can live with things like that.
     
  3. Morning Star

    Morning Star Well-Known Member

    Awww come on..why do that to yourself when they are the ones who lack any real value?

    I'd say use them as fossil fuel.

     
  4. andreboba

    andreboba Well-Known Member

    The study was about charitable giving and it's correlation to one's own wealth. It wasn't about some Liberal/Conservative dynamic.

    Why do you insert politics into everything?

    There are rich Libs. There are poor Conservatives. The opposite is also true.

    From the NPR article;

    Ever wonder how charitable the people are who live in your state or community? It turns out that lower-income people tend to donate a much bigger share of their discretionary incomes than wealthier people do. And rich people are more generous when they live among those who aren't so rich.


    THis isn't liberal propaganda. It's social science backed up by statistics.
    The ideological filter you're processing this data through is your own hang up.:smt012
     
  5. Ol'Skool Classic

    Ol'Skool Classic Well-Known Member



    [​IMG]
     
  6. Bookworm616

    Bookworm616 Well-Known Member

    It's speculation on the Democrats' part:

    He (Biden) said most seniors don't have to pay taxes on their Social Security benefits and millions more pay taxes on only a fraction of their benefits. If Romney's tax plan goes into effect, he said, "the average senior would have to pay $460 more in taxes on their benefits."

    Biden was extrapolating from studies that found Romney could not reach his goals of cutting taxes 20 percent for everyone and balancing the budget without ending or limiting some tax breaks that benefit the middle class. The assumption is that some of that tax burden would fall on Social Security benefits.

    Romney has been unwilling to specify what deductions he would seek to eliminate, which leaves room for the Obama campaign to speculate about the impact on Social Security beneficiaries. But Romney has never said that he would raise taxes on Social Security benefits, and he has promised that he will not reduce Social Security benefits for current retirees.

    Taken from: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162...omney-will-tax-your-social-security-benefits/
     
  7. JordanC

    JordanC Well-Known Member

    At what point do you think he will lay his plans out? Why so secret?
     
  8. GQ Brotha

    GQ Brotha New Member

    LOL, you politically inclined folks crack me up.

    I read the comments for fun.

    But always in the back of my mind I'm like "damn I really despise politicians."

    Every last one of the insufferable carpetbaggers and scalawags beholden to special interests and their finances.
     
  9. andreboba

    andreboba Well-Known Member

    Semi-corrupt elected politicians is better than the alternative.

    [​IMG]
    :smt118
     
  10. GQ Brotha

    GQ Brotha New Member

    ROFL.

    Come to think of it, either way you're fucked.
     
  11. JordanC

    JordanC Well-Known Member

    Well lets be clear. If you don't know what he is proposing then are people voting for Romney or Anti-Obama?? I am starting to wonder if you all aren't just anti Obama. Because if you don't know what you are voting for then how can you say if you are for or against??
     
  12. Ches

    Ches Well-Known Member

    As am I. But I can't see myself supporting Romney either. :smt102
     
  13. Bookworm616

    Bookworm616 Well-Known Member

    That couldn't come at a better time for Obama.

    But what about this:

    Temporary help jobs, which are often seen as a harbinger for permanent hiring, fell 2,000 after being almost flat in August.

    Manufacturing payrolls fell for a second straight month.

    Construction employment rose 5,000, benefiting from the rise in home construction, as demand for housing rises against the backdrop of record low mortgage rates

    Government payrolls rose 10,000 after increasing 45,000 in August. Average hourly earnings rose 7 cents last month, which could support spending.

    So, they add how many government jobs?? And manufacturing jobs fell again?

    I think the numbers aren't tellling the whole story.

    How many were FT, permanent hires? How many people have just given up looking for work, which would also bring the unemployment numbers down.

    And this is awfully convenient:

    Employment for July and August was revised to show 86,000 more jobs created than previous reported.

    Hmmm...how were 86,000 jobs missed???

    And how many jobs are seasonal retail jobs? The article I read didn't break down any of the numbers.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-september-jobs-report-20121005,0,7059647.story
     
  14. Loki

    Loki Well-Known Member


    Not true at all, there were open debates on C-span regarding the details of the bill.
     
  15. Loki

    Loki Well-Known Member

  16. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    So basically if its bad its his fault and if its good its bs. Got it lol. Unemployment has been gauged the same way for decades but now that Obama is in office we have to go through it with a fine comb. According to the critics he can do no right but I'll take him over Romney a million times over.
     
  17. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    If it were Romney in office my ass would be on a bread line.

    Dude's business practices and ethics coincide with profits over people every time. He does it in hopes that wealthy people's interests will line up with the country's interest. As a president I want someone who cares about the people as well as the economy. Making things more favorable business doesn't translate it being more favorable for everyone
     
  18. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    We were headed for a depression caused by the Republicans and even when shit was crashing and burning your boy McCain said the economy was still strong. It goes to show how out of touch that party is and we would have suffered greatly for that shit while those who did all the damage would sit back laughing on their piles of money.
     
  19. Bookworm616

    Bookworm616 Well-Known Member

    It doesn't matter who is in office, I would still be questioning the numbers. I just find it awfully convenient that two days after Obama does poorly in a debate about the economy, they find a way to magically find 86,000 jobs from July and August and unemployment dips below 8%.

    I just think the timing of this announcement is suspect.

    I look for what's behind the curtain and I've never given whatever President is in office at the time a "free pass" whether I voted for him or not.
     
  20. Bookworm616

    Bookworm616 Well-Known Member

    The economy does not fall squarely on the shoulders of Bush and the Republicans. Clinton had a hand in it as well.
     

Share This Page