What would have happen if TEA party took over?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NCBradin, Jan 10, 2010.

  1. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    I'm karmacoma and I approve this message.
     
  2. xoxo

    xoxo Well-Known Member

    What do you remember them saying then? These are from the Tea Parties in 07.

    thebostonteaparty2007.blogspot.com
    http://mysite.verizon.net/nathanielyao/index.html

    to protest the oppressive and unconstitutional inflation tax -
    which has enabled a flawed foreign policy, a costly war
    and the sacrificing of our liberties here at home.
    (All of which I agreed with)

    Those are 3 things in opposition to the administration under Bush. But you wouldn't know if you were watching mainstream media.

    They don't accept White Nationalists, White Nationalists have been among the tea parties from the beginning.


    These are all broad generalizations, and these aspects are mostly due to the neo-con involvement .

    Most of the current Tea baggers voted for Bush, "they" had their hate, I mean eight years in office and it was a disaster. Unless you are trying to differentiate between Tea Baggers and Bush voters, which you should, they, meaning Bush voters could get "their" candidate back in office in a few years.

    You mean more Non-White, Whites could be a minority in this country.

    Latino's also vote republican, and with Whiteness being mutable for some, there's no telling a Latino population growth will effect elections any differently then they have now.

    Being one of the few or only Black people at pre Neo-con tea parties I can tell you that you have only a bit of the picture. What you know fully well though is that there is a difference between "Tea Baggers" and other republican voters. That's why you said
    , by they, you didn't mean the neo-cons or GOP who were just in power and could easily get back, you probably meant another group of White folks you find more threatening. Am I wrong?
     
  3. Patterson

    Patterson New Member

    What exactly is "mainstream media"? Faux news talks a good game about mainstream media, but they are apart of the "mainstream media". So the teabaggers started their movement in 07? They waited until the end of the 2nd Bush term to protest the oppressive unconstitutional inflation tax, but one or two months in Obama's first year of his 1st term.ummkay Where are the racist signs against Bush's ethnicity?

    Ok, so they all accept each other, closet racist and overt racist, gotcha. So called God fearing partiotic republicans marching beside neo nazis & the like. Business as usual, nothing to see here.

    Which is you're opinion I agree to dissagree.

    I honestly don't think there's a difference between Bush voters and the teabaggers. The teabaggers are most likely Bush voters, I seriously doubt any of them would vote for a dem. Some may vote third party, but I'm sure they know just as much as you and I that 3rd party is usually a wasted vote. They would rather vote for the party they consider the lesser of two evils which in their minds is the GOP.

    Ditto

    Yes, I'm aware that latinos also vote republican. However, aging first generation Cuban population is changing demographics in huge ways. Majority of the cuban youth are registering as democrats, and don't forget it was the cubans that helped to put Obama over the top in FL. His approval ratings are still high with the latino and black community. Not to say that, none of this couldn't change between now and the '12 elections.


    Well, if there was ever a difference between the teabaggers and the other rethug voters, I doubt there is a difference any more. These people are rogue and are fueled by pundits, hate, faux news and other assorted rethugs. They are all one in the same, I can't think highly of people who accept and willingly mingle with low life scum like white nationalist, neo nazis etc. Its absurd how they deny that there is racist under tones amongst their members and at their rallies, even when its starring them right in the face. I've seen it with my own eyes, and its pathetic to say the least. Again, they are all one in the same IMO, so yes, you are wrong.
     
  4. Blacktiger2005

    Blacktiger2005 Well-Known Member

    C-SPAN will air the National Tea Party Convention this weekend with Sarah Palin as the keynote speaker. I think the Tea Movement will merge with the Republican Party by pushing out the more liberal or moderate Republicans, thus making the Republican Party more conservatives since both are in agreement on such issues as reducing taxes, national defense, less government, illegal immigration and excessive spending.
     
  5. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    The original Boston Tea Partiers got shot for treason against King George.
     
  6. xoxo

    xoxo Well-Known Member

    So you're saying that The Republicans will never get back in to office???? :smt017
     
  7. Patterson

    Patterson New Member

    Not at all, anything is possible, although I certianly hope they don't. In the present tense I don't see it happening, but who knows what will happen in 2012. American voters are a fickle bunch, so I won't rule rethugs out just yet.
     
  8. LA

    LA Well-Known Member

    Limbaugh would be president.
     
  9. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    I say Palin.
     
  10. LA

    LA Well-Known Member

    Palin/Limbaugh 2012.


    There would be soo much support behind it.
     
  11. SmoothDaddy101

    SmoothDaddy101 Well-Known Member

    But how many people would actually vote for them?
     
  12. LA

    LA Well-Known Member

    uhmm...
     

Share This Page