Random Conversation 2.0

I'm betting he really doesn't care. Who knows how much it really ends up to be too. Is that really his personal liquid wealth? Usually, those guys have most of it set up so it's not directly theirs to protect themselves.

"In my view, the parties probably have a very complicated asset structure," Michael Stutman, a New York-based divorce attorney, told Business Insider. "I am sure that there are a number of investment vehicles that have been already set up for their children and possibly other parties. While the two of them will be in control of a large portion of their financial empire, it's certainly not clear that it will be in the full amount that has been publicly cited."
 
K said:
I'm betting he really doesn't care. Who knows how much it really ends up to be too. Is that really his personal liquid wealth? Usually, those guys have most of it set up so it's not directly theirs to protect themselves.

"In my view, the parties probably have a very complicated asset structure," Michael Stutman, a New York-based divorce attorney, told Business Insider. "I am sure that there are a number of investment vehicles that have been already set up for their children and possibly other parties. While the two of them will be in control of a large portion of their financial empire, it's certainly not clear that it will be in the full amount that has been publicly cited."
Click to expand...
I think the worse thing that can happen to someone in his situation is if his wife ended up with a controlling interest in the company. In that case the divorce achieves nothing.

The man with the brains behind the business shouldn't have to run decisions by his ex wife who probably doesn't have the same knowledge and ability that he has.

Ideally there should be some kind of way he should be allowed to compensate her otherwise even if it extended over a period of time.

That's probably how it will be done anyway.

Personal opinion is that she should take one billion and roll out with that, irrespective of the law. That's a lot more than what can be reasonably spent in a lifetime.
 
Beasty said:
I think the worse thing that can happen to someone in his situation is if his wife ended up with a controlling interest in the company. In that case the divorce achieves nothing.

The man with the brains behind the business shouldn't have to run decisions by his ex wife who probably doesn't have the same knowledge and ability that he has.

Ideally there should be some kind of way he should be allowed to compensate her otherwise even if it extended over a period of time.

That's probably how it will be done anyway.

Personal opinion is that she should take one billion and roll out with that, irrespective of the law. That's a lot more than what can be reasonably spent in a lifetime.
Click to expand...

I seriously doubt it's even possible for her to take controlling interest in the company. When he sold 1 mill shares off the end of 2017 it was stated he still owned 16.4%. Recently it was reported he still owns 78.8 million shares. He's the largest stockholder. She does not own any stock directly. He may have to sell stock to split the estate with her. Chances are very high that they have already settled this before the point in time that it was announced. It's too detrimental to both of them and their children financially to not have this already agreed upon. Yes, it's possible things could change.
 
K said:
I seriously doubt it's even possible for her to take controlling interest in the company. When he sold 1 mill shares off the end of 2017 it was stated he still owned 16.4%. Recently it was reported he still owns 78.8 million shares. He's the largest stockholder. She does not own any stock directly. He may have to sell stock to split the estate with her. Chances are very high that they have already settled this before the point in time that it was announced. It's too detrimental to both of them and their children financially to not have this already agreed upon. Yes, it's possible things could change.
Click to expand...
True however if he splits stock with her that would make her the biggest stock holder as well even tho it's not a controlling interest, it still gives her big balls to swing. An ex wife with voting rights in your company is far from ideal. Imagine her electing dotard to the board of directors.

If he sells stock just to pay her it puts downward pressure on market value. I would go ahead and start selling ahead of that now as a trader, but it's probably still worth holding to a long term investor.

Either way they would both be fine but ideally it would be best if she would simply take a billion up front and a rain check for the rest.

Personally I would just take a billion and be done with it if I married a woman that became that rich.

50 million will buy a very nice Florida island with a mansion.

Unless the rest of the money can take you into outer space it's really pointless.
 
Last edited:
Oh shit! My GF's religion/people just got a TV show made about them! She's going to trip when I show her this. ...LOL!!!
Oohh the church is going to be pissed. I'm dying. ...LOL!!!!

 
samson1701 said:
Oh shit! My GF's religion/people just got a TV show made about them! She's going to trip when I show her this. ...LOL!!!
Oohh the church is going to be pissed. I'm dying. ...LOL!!!!

Click to expand...

You do know there are already a couple of "reality shows" that have Menonites on them right?
 
K said:
You do know there are already a couple of "reality shows" that have Menonites on them right?
Click to expand...
Yeah, we've watched all those to death. This one is a dramatization of the mennonites' involvement in smuggling drugs into Canada. She had no idea they were involved in drugs in anyway (so she says. Got damn innocent act don't fool me ...lol).

One of her favorite shows is Ozark. So, if this is that type of crime drama combined with her former "peoples" she'll watch and point out all the things they get wrong about mennonite culture while I'll crack jokes about her former life as a mafia hitwoman. Told you, she (nor that shiesty ass at of hers) don't fool me. I been sleeping with one eye open. ...LOL!!!!

FYI, what makes all this so funny is she is the sweetest person you'll ever meet. And has a heart attack about breaking even the smallest of laws. Been with me almost ten years and is juuusst now getting used to cussing (eventhough she sounds funny doing it).
 
  • Funny
Reactions: K
and I thought honda was out of touch. The new Supra is a joke. Make it great again.
50425879_10216583278006827_6368624609415135232_n.jpg
 
samson1701 said:
What's wrong? BMW's are nice cars. And those sealed vents can be made to work ... maybe. ... LOL!!!
Click to expand...
The Supra has been out of production almost 20 years and they bring it back adding only 15hp from the factory for an incredible 335 horses. lol. To compete with what exactly???

People usually get these cars to keep for the long term but this one is made from BMW parts, which german maintenance is known to be excessively expensive as the car ages. Not only that but german manufacturers are notorious for trying to thwart DIYers.
The way I see the sports/muscle car industry is

German: luxury
Asian: Handling
American: Straight line

People that like Japanese sports cars aren't going to go through the extra maintenance issues for the luxury that they don't need or want.

Also, the car looks like a Scion, and the sealed vents bruh...... here is a quote:

"The Supra's lead engineer, Tetsuya Tada, told Road & Track in a Wednesday report that the blocked off plastic vents can turn functional, and were developed with a Supra race car in mind. The chief engineer explained his team built a Supra race car halfway through development of the production road car and the vents all over the sports car's body are leftover from the race car's design."
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/automoti...-fake-vents-can-be-made-functional/1708076052


Really? You built a race car from this model then where is it? and why TF the sports road version only has 335 hp?

You want 50K for that???
985a7d223fcb7f2796aefce0f00e089e--wtf-face-chris-delia.jpg


There is also no manual option. Is this really what Toyota and BWM came up with when they put their heads together?

upload_2019-1-21_20-6-57.jpeg
Yeah BMW's are nice, but would you pick this over one? I'd rather find a clean Supra from 2000 -2002 and buy that.

Personally I'm waiting to see how the new Z car turns out (Thank goodness Nissan isn't retarded) Also there is a mid engine Corvette coming out soon enough. I'm curious what the price point is going to be. Corvettes have always been a good value.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom