Soulthinker
Well-Known Member
True indeed. Warren is suited for cabinet job or just be a senator. Bernie is clueless on Black issues and old, Beto is wishy washy,
Random Political comments...
- Thread starter Bliss
- Start date
Soulthinker
Well-Known Member
Great observations. I hope Kamila will get nominated if the women eruptions derail Biden. As for the Black vote especially women Beto,Bernie, Liz,and the Mayor can't cut it.
Soulthinker
Well-Known Member
Booker might as well hang it up since he is just clowning.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
I don't like lackeys and phony people. Keep Kamala, I rather have 45. Don't need a pacifier, either there is milk in the bottle or keep it. One thing I like about 45 is he keeps everything in the open. He doesn't hide his racism. We been under the illusion of inclusion for a while now and negroes just skin and grin like everything is cool. Nah bruh hard pass.
You keep electing Republicans to positions of leadership, these numbers are only going to get worse.
I don't understand Black folk who think both political parties are the same difference and offer no advantage for Black people.
Half the time Beasty you sound like someone who has no interest in voting because you think the results don't matter.
The Dark King
Well-Known Member
Agreed. But maybe for him personally it won't.... Until it does
Beasty
Well-Known Member
Half of the negroes don't know what those numbers are to begin with, too short sighted and silly. Why do you think it's been that way for so long?
Because we haven't been voting?
I'm just not one to sweep trash under the rug. Don't need to be handled with kid gloves or play games.
I'll vote Beto, Biden, or Booker. Hold the pacifier and the white Jesus.
Thump
Well-Known Member
Nobody thought you were forcing your opinion, you can support whoever you want, discussing our political views is what this thread is for.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
.32 seconds
That poor child ..
In this one, shocked at the amount of child groping, kissing, caressing massaging and inappropriate dating age questions he asks of liitle girls. (one girl calls for her dad)
Who are you fooling?? You're the Pussy Grabber in Chief's #1 supporter.
There's no traction here for Trump supporters, considering @15 women accused him of sexual assault before the 2016 primaries.
Bliss
Well-Known Member
bodhesatva
Well-Known Member
Quoting myself about Bernie Sanders:
I just wanted to talk about that for a second.
First, look at Amy Klobuchar's record in the senate for comparison. If you scroll down a bit, you can see the bills she has sponsored (meaning written and put forth herself). She's been in congress for 12 years, and has been the primary author of 33 separate bills that have since become law. That's a high total, and averages out to 2.75 bills per year.
Now, look at Bernie Sander's record. He's been in Congress for 28 years (12 in Senate, 16 in house), and been the primary author of 7 bills that have become law, for an average of .25 bills passed per year. Bernie Sanders' passes laws at 1/11th the rate that Amy Klobuchar does.
The same pattern holds if you look at bills cosponsored, which means cowritten or endorsed (Bernie has cosponsored far fewer bills than Klobuchar or Gillibrand, for instance). My point is that Bernie is a great guy (in my opinion) but he's really not very good at turning his ideas in to actual laws. That matters a lot to me. I think that many of the other candidates (most notably Klobuchar, Biden, and Warren) have proven a lot more effective at getting bills written and passed. I think Bernie is a great standard bearer for the liberal movement, but I'm a little skeptical about his ability to actually get a lot done if he were elected President.
I just wanted to talk about that for a second.
First, look at Amy Klobuchar's record in the senate for comparison. If you scroll down a bit, you can see the bills she has sponsored (meaning written and put forth herself). She's been in congress for 12 years, and has been the primary author of 33 separate bills that have since become law. That's a high total, and averages out to 2.75 bills per year.
Now, look at Bernie Sander's record. He's been in Congress for 28 years (12 in Senate, 16 in house), and been the primary author of 7 bills that have become law, for an average of .25 bills passed per year. Bernie Sanders' passes laws at 1/11th the rate that Amy Klobuchar does.
The same pattern holds if you look at bills cosponsored, which means cowritten or endorsed (Bernie has cosponsored far fewer bills than Klobuchar or Gillibrand, for instance). My point is that Bernie is a great guy (in my opinion) but he's really not very good at turning his ideas in to actual laws. That matters a lot to me. I think that many of the other candidates (most notably Klobuchar, Biden, and Warren) have proven a lot more effective at getting bills written and passed. I think Bernie is a great standard bearer for the liberal movement, but I'm a little skeptical about his ability to actually get a lot done if he were elected President.
Last edited:
AtomSmasher86
Well-Known Member
Trump is trash for treating women like toilet paper, but it doesn't justify Biden for doing the same....hell Al Gore had real accusations against him, and lets not forget Bill Clinton. But then again the Reich wing had Clarence Thomas, and Denis Hastert and their sex scandals....it's safe to say people who occupy important govt. positions tend to be scummy individuals.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
It's not about justifying. It's about one candidate vs the other. If both are guilty of similar behavior it's a wash. Move on to the next category and compare them that way.
Sounds shitty? Well you can thank 45's supporters for putting the oval office on low standards. That's all it is to it.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
Giving someone a hug who doesn't want to be touched is in a totally different category than groping a woman or sexually assaulting them.
The problem is the #Metoo movement is trying to equate all 'bad touches' as the same, which isn't the case at all.
Biden hugs, grabs shoulders and kisses heads. That's it. That's the list. Maybe it's uncomfortable for some, but calling that 'inappropriate touching' seems to be a poor definition.
It's not like he was grabbing ass or rubbing side boobs. Or reaching between a woman's legs and slipping his fingers through their underwear to grab their pussy.
For anyone to even suggest this is a sex scandal for Biden is really blowing up something into nothing.
When I was kid I had several teachers who grabbed shoulders and hugged. No one ever tried to imply what we experienced was some form of sexual assault.
I'll prop TDK on this one, it's only a problem for women when the person harmlessly touching them is someone they don't WANT to touch them.
The issue isn't the touch itself.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
Hugs, grabbing shoulders and kissing someone's head are now (sexually) inappropriate touching??
Like when Trump would routinely grab between a woman's legs or grab her boobs??
Obama did the same shit Biden did, except for that head kissing. Most politicians do.
Trump wouldn't last 5 minutes in your random strip club.
Hugs aren't inappropriate, snowflake. Neither is a shoulder grab. You may not want someone to touch you period, but it's nowhere hear what Trump was doing. If the average fuck tried to do what Trump did, they'd be arrested for sexual assault.
Euros kiss cheeks. Is that inappropriate touching too?? How about the generic handshake??
Again, you can't get into this discussion legitimately when you elected a man who ADMITTED he grabbed women by their genitals because he could get away with it.
Or who said he'd date his own daughter if he wasn't related to her.
Bliss
Well-Known Member
I couldn't care less about the adult women since YOU and LIBERALS now suddenly DGAF. It's hilarious to watch you try to spin your 180..Hugs, grabbing shoulders and kissing someone's head are now (sexually) inappropriate touching??
Like when Trump would routinely grab between a woman's legs or grab her boobs??
Obama did the same shit Biden did, except for that head kissing. Most politicians do.
Trump wouldn't last 5 minutes in your random strip club.
Hugs aren't inappropriate, snowflake. Neither is a shoulder grab. You may not want someone to touch you period, but it's nowhere hear what Trump was doing. If the average fuck tried to do what Trump did, they'd be arrested for sexual assault.
Euros kiss cheeks. Is that inappropriate touching too?? How about the generic handshake??
Again, you can't get into this discussion legitimately when you elected a man who ADMITTED he grabbed women by their genitals because he could get away with it.
Or who said he'd date his own daughter if he wasn't related to her.
YOU aren't fooling anyone.
Trump said that "you can". Not that he did. Trump locker-room yapped to another grown man about grown women.
Unlike here, we see your sleazy uncle Joe go for the kill on little girls. Over and over.
Your creepy uncle Joe whispered dirty things right into their little ears. He actually kissed, groped, grabbed, groomed, carressed, massaged, squeezed and rubbed the kids without asking. Over and over and over. See the difference?
Let's also talk about your first Black Prez, Billy, who raped women and dropped his jocks to flash his cock.
Your party has mega-sleaze balls but pretend to be mother-Teresa's. Drop the bullshit facade already. Then we can have an honest conversation.
Bliss
Well-Known Member
First Undocumented Immigrant Appointed to State Post in California
Chantal Da Silva
NewsweekMarch 15, 2018
For the first time in California's history, the state has appointed an undocumented resident0 to a statewide post, announcing the decision just a day after President Donald Trump attacked its immigration approach during a visit to San Diego.
The decision made by the Senate Rules Committee on Wednesday saw Lizbeth Mateo, a 33-year-old attorney and immigrant rights activist, appointed to serve on a committee that helps increase college access for students from low-income or underserved communities.
In announcing the decision, Senate President pro tempore Kevin de León appeared to recognize the move as an act of defiance in the face of the Trump administration's current immigration crackdown.
"While Donald Trump fixates on walls, California will continue to concentrate on opportunities," De León told The Sacramento Bee in a statement. "Ms. Mateo is a courageous, determined and intelligent young woman who at great personal risk has dedicated herself to fight for those seeking their rightful place in this country."
Mateo said she welcomed the opportunity, telling the newspaper that "while undocumented students have become more visible in our state, they remain under-represented in places where decisions that affect them are being made."
....California became the first state in the U.S. to allow undocumented immigrants to practice law in 2014, with New York following in its footsteps not long after...
Chantal Da Silva
NewsweekMarch 15, 2018
For the first time in California's history, the state has appointed an undocumented resident0 to a statewide post, announcing the decision just a day after President Donald Trump attacked its immigration approach during a visit to San Diego.
The decision made by the Senate Rules Committee on Wednesday saw Lizbeth Mateo, a 33-year-old attorney and immigrant rights activist, appointed to serve on a committee that helps increase college access for students from low-income or underserved communities.
In announcing the decision, Senate President pro tempore Kevin de León appeared to recognize the move as an act of defiance in the face of the Trump administration's current immigration crackdown.
"While Donald Trump fixates on walls, California will continue to concentrate on opportunities," De León told The Sacramento Bee in a statement. "Ms. Mateo is a courageous, determined and intelligent young woman who at great personal risk has dedicated herself to fight for those seeking their rightful place in this country."
Mateo said she welcomed the opportunity, telling the newspaper that "while undocumented students have become more visible in our state, they remain under-represented in places where decisions that affect them are being made."
....California became the first state in the U.S. to allow undocumented immigrants to practice law in 2014, with New York following in its footsteps not long after...
Bliss
Well-Known Member
Canadian Court fined man $55,000 for calling a man a biological male
104-page ruling – “mis-gendering” is now a “hate crime”
The Tribunal noted that truth is no defense.
105 page download of ruling if interested -
https://www.massresistance.org/docs...es3/58_Oger_v_Whatcott_No_7_2019_BCHRT_58.pdf
- Last week the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal fined Christian activist Bill Whatcott $55,000 for the crime of "mis-gendering."
They ordered him to “refrain from committing the same or a similar contravention.”
Whatcott is allowed think his thoughts on Christian morality and privately speak them to another person. But his thoughts on transgenderism may not be expressed in the public arena.
John Carpay, president of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom, which defended Whatcott, noted in protest, “The Supreme Court of Canada has long held that freedom of expression is the lifeblood of democracy.” But not when it crosses the lines of transgender activism. Freedom halts there.
Carpay added, “Society is full of people with diverse views and the Court's decision undermines the foundational principles of the free society and jeopardizes the health of Canada’s democracy.”
*BTW, it's illlegal in CA, as well.
https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen3/18d/Whatcott-BC-Tribunal/ruling.html
104-page ruling – “mis-gendering” is now a “hate crime”
The Tribunal noted that truth is no defense.
105 page download of ruling if interested -
https://www.massresistance.org/docs...es3/58_Oger_v_Whatcott_No_7_2019_BCHRT_58.pdf
- Last week the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal fined Christian activist Bill Whatcott $55,000 for the crime of "mis-gendering."
They ordered him to “refrain from committing the same or a similar contravention.”
Whatcott is allowed think his thoughts on Christian morality and privately speak them to another person. But his thoughts on transgenderism may not be expressed in the public arena.
John Carpay, president of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom, which defended Whatcott, noted in protest, “The Supreme Court of Canada has long held that freedom of expression is the lifeblood of democracy.” But not when it crosses the lines of transgender activism. Freedom halts there.
Carpay added, “Society is full of people with diverse views and the Court's decision undermines the foundational principles of the free society and jeopardizes the health of Canada’s democracy.”
*BTW, it's illlegal in CA, as well.
https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen3/18d/Whatcott-BC-Tribunal/ruling.html
The Dark King
Well-Known Member
Word? Where's Obama's and Bernie's scandals? Sure Elizabeth Warren is clean as a whistle.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
Trump said he can because he DID. What 60 year old man jokes about grabbing women by their genitals?? That's bizarre.
He was just telling on himself and thought Billie Bush was as much of a degenerate as he was.
And no, Biden was not molesting those kids. Says more about where your head is at to actually see something that didn't happen.
Whispered dirty things into their ears?? Keep hoping.
Trump pays off pornstars and centerfolds so his current wife and the public doesn't find out when he's running for public office. Trump also patrolled backstage at his beauty pageants to catch his contestants in various states of undress. And he also dreams about bedding his daughter.
Try to stay current. THe man now occupying the WH is a POS and an embarrassment to the office.
If you support Trump, you simply cannot talk shit about Biden grabbing shoulders and hugging people.
If Biden did half the shit Trump did, he couldn't run for office.
And I'll put Dem 'sleazeballs' up against the GOP anytime. At least Dems don't wrap themselves in the Bible and say they stand for family values.