I think I understand your thinking, but we disagree here. Yes, Disney was chiefly concerned about money. That's capitalism. But the decision to lean into the representation angle (instead of just doing it the way it's always been done) didn't have to be made. They could've gone a completely different direction in pursuit of the bottom line. I'm not saying they're altruistic at all. But they did break new ground.
By your logic you can't attribute any motive to any corporate decision other than profit. What decision could they possibly ever make that wouldn't be pandering to somebody? The entire purpose of any company is to profit. Therefore doesn't every company have to "pander" to its customers in every instance?
Maybe I'm missing what you mean by pandering.
This is known as a strawman fallacy, compounded with a single cause in order to oversimplify the argument and therefore win an argument that wasn’t actually there(as oppose to the initial argument). Not a fan of it, bud.
Here is what happens, those who are in charge of marketing, as well as brainstorming, meet with analysts. They inform those in charge of currenr trends and how those trends may cause a demand for a specific type of product. That product caters to a potential consumer/ audience in order to increase sales. The pandering exists due to the trend of online social justice via social media (which is the current trend and was back then). Pandering, seeks to appease a specific group. In the case of capitalism, it seeks to appease that group to develop a relationship of that group coming back for more due to potential representation. This was shown with Captain Marvel, and yes, Black Panther. The trends provided them with potentially beneficial outcomes, so they bet on it.
Disney CEO Bob Iger Reveals 'Black Panther' and 'Captain Marvel' Almost Didn't Happen
https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a29225846/black-panther-captain-marvel-almost-didnt-happen/
I’d keep going into more detail, but this is the nerds lounge and people get upset when we delve into critical thinking, in regards to how hollywood decides to make films and black male characters.
I will say, that your confusion is in regards to me saying that the film isn’t about representation, when I am saying it isn’t about representation to the company, it’s about pandering for extra cash. It is, however, about representation to the actors, film crew, director, and audience, which isn’t what I was talking about.