Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"But..but what about my freedom & God given rights to be ain't shit, though?"
What's your point? The first part of this meme is flawed because it compares how many people die from hypothermia vs. the entire U.S. population, while the official CDC stats in the tweet I posted compared how many people died from COVID-19 vs. the amount of actual COVID-19 cases.
As for the 2nd part of this meme, I guess it's comparing coats & hats to the whole masks debate. First of all, Pre-COVID-19 pandemic & now 8 months into the pandemic, there has NEVER been any conclusive scientific evidence that masks work. For example, there was recently a large danish clinical trial on the efficacy of masks. None of the big medical journals want to publish the study because the results are not politically correct right now:
As far as my person opinion on masks, I look at masks as they're better than nothing. That's it. The folks who act a fool in public when they're required to wear in a public setting around other people are dumb AF. But the people on the other end of the spectrum who think that masks are better than vaccines (i.e. Dr. Redfield, head of the CDC) or promote & push these fake stats about how we can save tens-hundreds of thousands of lives if everyone wore a mask are also ridiculous AF.
The point is this is how ridiculous mask deniers and people who don’t take the virus seriously sound. It’s meant to be low on facts and actual context.
As far as that study, I’d like to see it. I have questions.
1. What kinds of masks were used?
2. Where they testing transmission rates or infection rates? Because, no one ever said that a mask would protect the wearer (unless it was an N95). We mostly wear the masks to protect others from catching it from us.
3. How large was the study?
4. Has anyone tried to replicate the study, yet?
Can you link to the fake stats? And, can you tell me why you think they’re fake?
I agree about vaccines, though. That’s really the only way we end up getting back to anywhere close to normal. Unless, they figure out an effective treatment that doesn’t cost too much and doesn’t have crazy side effects. I don’t have much faith that will happen anytime soon.
The mask study finally dropped Yesterday:
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1329070150671167495
![]()
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
Full size image from the tweet:
![]()
https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1329086854725963777
![]()
https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1329177353172492301
![]()
Lead Researcher Behind Controversial Danish Study Says You Should Still Wear A Mask
TOPLINE
A Covid-19 study conducted in Denmark and published in Annals of Internal Medicine created a heated discourse on social media as some claimed that the study showed masks were ineffective at preventing Covid-19 transmission, while health experts--including the lead researcher behind the study--disagreed.
![]()
GETTY
KEY FACTS
The study, authored by a group of cardiologists in Denmark, studied about 6,000 participants in Denmark, half of whom were told to wear masks and half of whom were not.
The authors found that 42 of the participants who were told to wear masks contracted Covid-19, while 53 of the participants in the control group got the disease, a difference that they said was not statistically significant.
The study did not investigate whether masks prevented those infected with Covid-19 from infecting other people.
Some politically conservative voices on social media have touted this study as proof that masks won’t stop the spread of Covid-19.
However, experts swiftly pointed out that the study has many limitations, including low compliance (many people did not complete the study, and a high percentage of people who were supposed to wear masks did not) and that it took place in a population where spread of Covid-19 was already low.
Multiple studies have found that mask wearing has a big impact on Covid-19, including one in October which found areas in Tennessee with mask mandates had lower hospitalization rates than areas that don’t.
CRUCIAL QUOTE
While the study found little evidence that masks protected the wearers from Covid-19, it should not be used as evidence to not wear a mask. “Even a small degree of protection is worth using the face masks,” says Dr. Henning Bundgaard, professor of Cardiology at Rigshospitalet in Denmark and lead author of the study, “because you are protecting yourself against a potentially life-threatening disease."
CHIEF CRITIC
Dr. Tom Frieden, former Director for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), wrote a response to the study that was also published in Annals of Internal Medicine. In it, he pointed out that among other limitations, the study authors used antibody tests to diagnose cases of Covid-19 which could have led to a significant number of false positives. In addition, the authors did not make an effort to ensure that people who were told to wear masks wore them correctly, or at all times.Bundgaard replies that the compliance rate was still “considerably better” in the study compared to regular society. He agreed that it was possible that the antibody tests could have led to false positives, but “that risk is in both groups, and that would probably even it out."
KEY BACKGROUND
Dr. Christine Laine, an internal medicine physician and Editor-in-Chief of Annals of Internal Medicine, says that the study did a good job of answering a very specific question: whether or not face masks protect wearers from SARS-CoV-2 infection in areas with low infection rates and high levels of social distancing. "It did not answer the question about whether widespread masking mitigates SARS-CoV-2 infection,” she says, adding that while there were concerns over misinterpretation, the editors agreed publishing this study was important because it is “the only randomized control trial of masks for SARS-CoV-2 infection that has been done to date…this was an important, well-designed study.”
TANGENT
Earlier this month, the CDC updated its mask guidelines to say that masks, including cloth masks, are important to wear because they not only prevent the spread of droplets if someone is infected with Covid-19, but they can also protect the wearer of the mask from the virus. The organization wrote that cloth mask materials could help protect the wearer through filtration of infectious droplets, though much of this evidence has come from lab simulations and not real-world studies. In discussing preventing disease spread, Bundgaard emphasizes that “the face mask is part of it, but it's not the [whole] solution." He says that people should still be practicing regular hand washing and social distancing in order to control the spread of Covid-19.
I've talked to a disturbing amount of people who said they don't plan on getting vaccinated when they become available. I'm blown away by this kind of thinking.
Most of them are older folks that I work with, these are people who are right in the covid danger zone (over 65 and butt loads of underlying conditions) Their reasoning seems to be that if other people get it (and assume the risk of side-effects) they don't have to, they seem to be counting on a human immunity shield. I've told some of them that isn't the best strategy but they don't seem to care.Are they anti vaxxers overall or people who just aren't getting it right away when it becomes available? I know a few (black folks in particular) who aren't getting it right away just to make sure it is safe with no adverse side effects. That Tuskegee Syndrome makes a lot of black folks leery about any kind of new medical related things straight from the get go.
The mask study finally dropped Yesterday:
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1329070150671167495
![]()
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
Full size image from the tweet:
![]()
https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1329086854725963777
![]()
https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1329177353172492301
![]()
At some point you have to rely on common sense and not social media.
During a flu outbreak or COVID19, do you think it makes sense to wash your hands more frequently or not at all??
You need to stop making this pandemic a political issue. It's not about scoring points against the libs.