Proof please becaise I've never heard of that.
Victoria didnt raise Albert either, undoubtedly as a combination of both her desire to rule on her own, and the perception that the people would not stand for a foreign king.
It is also assumed that Charles's wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, will not be queen either. She has never been given the title of Princess of Wales, probably because the British people would never have stood for it (Diana, Charles's first wife, and he divorced amid lots of recriminations and the public evidence he'd been cheating on her with Camilla from the start).
When Philip and Elizabeth married, he was made HRH Philip, Duke of Edinborough. He had to convert to Anglicanism, and reject his Greek and Danish titles and become a UK citizen.
In terms of precedence a King is higher than a Queen, which means that in every case where there is a King and a Queen, the King would outrank the Queen. When it is a Queen who holds the throne in her own right (a Queen regnant, like the present Queen Elizabeth II), her consort has been referred to as a Price to make the point that it is she that takes precedence. Therefore, the Queen Mother was Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth (Queen to King George VI), but Queen Victoria's husband was Prince Albert and Queen Elizabeth II's husband is Prince Philip.
Because she did not want to give him precedence over here, Elizabeth chose not to make him king.
Mary Tudor did make her husband King, though his duties in Spain and probably his dislike for her meant he didnt spend much time or energy in England except to try and ensure it remained Catholic
From the biography of Mary
The marriage took place two days after their meeting, on July 25th, the day of St. James- patron saint of Spain. After the wedding, they were proclaimed:
Philip and Mary, by the grace of God, King and Queen of England, France and Naples, Jerusalem and Ireland, defenders of the faith, Princes of Spain and Sicily, Archdukes of Austria, Dukes of Milan, Burgundy and Brabant, Counts of Habsburg, Flanders and the Tyrol.
The only example where both a King and a Queen have jointly shared power and held the throne is with King William and Queen Mary at the end of the 17th century. This was because they held the throne jointly.
When James VII fled, the throne was offered to his daughter Mary, who was married to William of Orange (after William invaded) and the throne was offered to them jointly, in spite of the fact that it was Mary who was in line for the throne. Upon her death, William ruled until 1702 in his own name. Since they had no living children, Mary's sister Anne took the throne, and did not make her husband king.
There has been a long tradition of English queens not making their husbands king, especially if the husband is not British by birth. The British are rather dubious about being ruled by foreigners.
